Enslaved men who joined the Union Army often became part of the United States Colored Troops (USCT). Since they were property by law in slaveholding states, their enlistment could be considered a "taking" by the government, prompting the government to create compensation measures.

To receive compensation, slave owners had to prove loyalty to the Union and submit a claim documenting the enlistment of the enslaved person.

Compensation claims were typically filed with the War Department or other designated agencies.

In the slave compensation claims system during the Civil War, the maximum amount that a slave owner could claim for an enslaved individual who enlisted in the Union Army was $300 per person. This amount was standardized and applied regardless of the enslaved person’s age, skills, or background. This amount was often lower than the enslaved person's market value.

Here’s how this maximum compensation amount worked in practice:

1) Flat Rate Per Enlisted Individual: The federal government determined a fixed compensation rate of $300 per enslaved person who enlisted. This amount aimed to compensate loyal Union slave owners for the "loss of labor" without delving into variable valuations.

This flat rate did not account for the actual "market value" that slave owners may have placed on individuals, which could be much higher.

2) No Additional Compensation for Death or Injury: The $300 was the maximum compensation regardless of the outcome of the enlistment. If an enslaved individual died in service or was injured, no additional compensation was awarded to the owner.

3) Limitations on Multiple Claims: Owners could file multiple claims if several enslaved people from their holdings enlisted, with $300 paid per person enlisted. However, each claim had to meet specific eligibility criteria, such as the owner’s loyalty to the Union.

4) Purpose and Policy: The $300 was a way for the Union government to incentivize slave owners to allow enslaved individuals to enlist without significant financial "loss." However, many owners considered it insufficient, as it often didn’t reflect the enslaved person’s market value.

While the amount might seem minimal compared to the actual value that enslaved individuals represented to slave owners, it provided a fixed, manageable compensation policy aligned with the Union's military and political goals.

1) Military Enlistment: Compensation was primarily issued to slave owners if the enslaved individual enlisted in the Union Army, typically joining the United States Colored Troops (USCT).

2) Loyalty of Slave Owner: Only slave owners who were loyal to the Union could file for compensation. Confederate supporters were excluded, limiting the program to Union-aligned owners.

3) Freedom of the Enslaved Individual: In some compensated emancipation programs, such as Washington, D.C.’s in 1862, enslaved people did not have to enlist but were freed with compensation given to their owners.

4) Responsibilities of Enslaved Individuals: Enslaved individuals who enlisted were expected to serve in the Union Army, typically for the remainder of the Civil War. They were assigned various duties, including combat, labor, and support roles, depending on the needs of the regiment.

The enlistment meant the enslaved individual would be required to complete their service and follow the duties typical of Union soldiers, receiving military training, equipment, and provisions.

5) Age Range for Enslaved Individuals: Generally, young adult men, especially those between ages 18 and 45, were targeted for enlistment. This age range aligned with the standard enlistment guidelines of the time, emphasizing those physically able to serve.

In some cases, boys as young as 16 were accepted, though this varied depending on regional military needs and the discretion of recruiting officers.

Older enslaved men and women, as well as young children, were not eligible for compensation related to enlistment unless they were emancipated under different compensated emancipation policies, such as those enacted in Washington, D.C., where no specific age limits were mandated.

If an enslaved soldier died in service, the owner was still eligible to receive the $300 compensation. The payment served as a flat fee for the "loss" rather than a reflection of any specific contribution to the war effort or the soldier's fate.

1) Failure to Prove Loyalty to the Union: Only Union-loyal slave owners were eligible for compensation. If a claimant could not prove loyalty or had supported the Confederacy, the claim would be rejected. This was a key requirement, especially in border states with divided loyalties.

2) Inadequate Documentation of Ownership: Claimants had to provide documentation proving ownership of the enslaved individual. If they lacked legal proof, such as bills of sale or estate records, the claim would likely be denied.

3) Failure to Prove Enlistment: The claim had to show that the enslaved person actually enlisted in the Union Army. If there was no record of enlistment or if the government could not confirm it, the claim would be dismissed.

4) Claims Filed Outside of Approved Areas or States: The federal government restricted compensation claims to certain regions, particularly in border states where slavery was legal, yet owners remained loyal to the Union. Claims filed outside these states were not eligible.

5) Disputes Over Compensation Amounts: Some claims were rejected if there was a dispute over the amount of compensation. If a claimant argued for a higher valuation than the standard $300, the claim could be denied or delayed.

6) Fraudulent Claims or Inconsistencies: In cases of fraud or suspected deception—such as inflated claims of ownership or enlistment—claims were carefully scrutinized and often rejected if inconsistencies were found.

7) Late Submission of Claims: Claims had to be filed within a specific time frame. Any claims submitted after the deadline were typically rejected, as the government sought to close the program and settle all valid claims promptly.

8) Incorrect Filing Procedures: If the claim was filed improperly, such as through the wrong department or lacking required forms, it could be rejected. Some claimants were unfamiliar with the procedures, leading to disqualification due to technicalities.

9) Legal Disputes Over Enslaved Individuals’ Status: Some enslaved people had ambiguities around their status, such as partial manumission or conflicting claims to ownership. Legal disputes over these issues could result in the rejection of claims.

10) Claims from Owners of Enslaved Individuals Who Deserted or Were Freed Elsewhere: If an enslaved individual deserted the military, escaped before enlisting, or was freed in another jurisdiction, the owner would have no valid claim, and any submission for compensation would be denied.

These records typically document the enlistment of the individual into the United States Colored Troops (USCT), including the regiment or company, dates of service, and sometimes information on death or discharge.

Enlistment records within the USCT can provide information on enlistment dates, physical descriptions, and sometimes pension records, which are rich with personal details.

If an enlisted enslaved person survived the war, they might later qualify for a military pension. Pension files can include personal testimonies, affidavits from family members, and information about marriages and children, offering further biographical insights.